[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11 |
Date: |
Sat, 17 May 2014 09:48:33 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) |
Markus Wanner <address@hidden> writes:
> On 05/16/2014 05:17 PM, Stephen Leake wrote:
>> Markus Wanner <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Interesting, I thought I tested that. But you're right, this looks like
>>> the macro doesn't do what it's supposed to do. It itself claims:
>>>
>>> # The first argument, if specified, indicates whether you insist on an
>>> # extended mode (e.g. -std=gnu++11) or a strict conformance mode (e.g.
>>> # -std=c++11). If neither is specified, you get whatever works, with
>>> # preference for an extended mode.
>>>
>>> I left it unspecified, as I'm fine with whatever works (tm).
>>>
>>> I corrected the order of tests, now. So for gcc, it now yields the c++??
>>> rather than gnu++?? variants.
>>
>> But it says "with preference for an extended mode.", which means it
>> should pick gnu++ if both work. Which is what it did.
>
> Oh, right, I read that the wrong way around. Thanks for clarifying.
>
> Either way, the script now does what we want it to do. I should adjust
> the comment, though.
>
>> If we are also supporting clang and MSVC, we need c++11, not gnu++11 (I
>> think).
>
> Well, the intent of the script is to *test* what works and what not.
> (And MSVC needs an entirely different build system.)
I meant we need to enforce using only standard C++ 2011 constructs, and
not allow Gnu extensions, since the Gnu extensions are not likely to be
supported by clang and MSVC.
--
-- Stephe
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11,
Stephen Leake <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/16
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/16