Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] add an "atends" configuration setting

[markweston]

> 5) I don't like '--towordends' either.  In my ears '--afterends'
> sounds better, because even just the word "after" already says
> enough.  And it leaves it open whether this option will apply to
> Ctrl+Down too later on.

So now I have to send a new patch that expands the "afterends" behaviour
to Ctrl+Down and Shift+Ctrl+Down, or should I rename this to 
"afterwordends"
and send a new patch that introduces "afterblockends" option?