Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] add an "afterends" configuration setting

[markweston]

 >>> How many blank lines do you have between blocks of text?
> > Two.
>
> Text or code?  Because if it is text, you could try the paragraph
> jumping commands: M-9 and M-0.

Code.

> If you want a changed Ctrl+Down behavior so badly: you know how to
> modify nano.  I've used a custom nano for years.

I would not have the time to maintain it.

> > I still don't understand why you said you wouldn't accept two options 
> > instead.
> > "afterwordends" and "afterblockends" would keep us both satisfied.
> > Are you saving the 64 configuration flag bits?
>
> I don't care about the bits.  It's easy enough to extend.  And I've
> thought about making it a byte per flag: to make it faster.
>
> Now the question: are you okay with the v6 version of the patch that
> I posted?

I would like to rename it to "afterwordends".
Then I could send a "afterblockends" patch later on.
But I already asked for this and you rejected it without providing any 
reason.
I assume the reason is that you would consider that patch useless code 
bloat.

> Op 07-05-18 om 19:29 schreef address@hidden:
> And it leaves it open whether this option will apply to
> Ctrl+Down too later on.
>
> > So now I have to send a new patch
>
> You don't have to send anything.  Also because it is unlikely to get
> accepted: I think there is no need for making Ctrl+Down go to the first
> blank line after a block of text.  Also: Geany does not do that either.
> Is there any other editor that does this?
>
> > that expands the "afterends" behaviour
> > to Ctrl+Down and Shift+Ctrl+Down,
>
> Yes, *if* anything, then this.
>
> > or should I rename this to "afterwordends"
> > and send a new patch that introduces "afterblockends" option?
>
> Certainly not.

So I guess I will have to deal with this.