[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57771] [Manual] Compiling Octave with 64-bit
From: |
Juan Pablo Carbajal |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57771] [Manual] Compiling Octave with 64-bit indexing |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Feb 2020 07:42:17 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:72.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/72.0 |
URL:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57771>
Summary: [Manual] Compiling Octave with 64-bit indexing
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: juanpi
Submitted on: Sat 08 Feb 2020 12:42:15 PM UTC
Category: Documentation
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Documentation
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name: juanpi
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Release: 5.2.0
Discussion Lock: Any
Operating System: GNU/Linux
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Following the instructions in
https://octave.org/doc/interpreter/Compiling-Octave-with-64_002dbit-Indexing.html
I found the following
* BLAS and LAPACK: (version 3.9.0)
* There is no OPTS nor NOOPT variable in make.inc.example. Only
FFLAGS_NOOPT, should the other variables be create? Is it enough to modify
this variable?
* Advise to change installation prefix by modifying the variable
CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH in the CMakeCache.txt file
* QRUPDATE: the variable to change the lib folder BLAS and LAPACK are
commented as they are only needed for tests in the Makeconf file
Failure:
* SuiteSparse: fails with -lopenblas missing. I assume it shouldn't be looking
for openblas, but my recently compiled library, shouldn't the instructions say
how to change the library to link with?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57771>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57771] [Manual] Compiling Octave with 64-bit indexing,
Juan Pablo Carbajal <=