[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59076] subplot replaces previously created axes

[Pantxo Diribarne]

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #59076 (project octave):

>> I wonder if it would make sense to keep the old logic and add the new logic
if the old one failed.

I think the old logic is broken since a subplot position may change, e.g. due
to the addition of a large title, and the stored position is then made
obsolete.

>> Also it might be clearer to add an "all" around "size (rcn) == [1 3]" in
the condition. 

Yes, I'll do that thanks for noticing.

>> But is it possible that an axes looses its appdata somehow? IIRC, e.g.
"plot" resets about everything in an axes if hold is "off". 

All the job is done by the newplot function: we retrieve the axes appdata
before clearing all listeners and children. After that the orphaned clean axes
is turned into a subplot again using "subplot (ROWS, COLS, INDEX, HAX)".  


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59076>

_______________________________________________
  Message posté via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/