|
From: | Markus Mützel |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59702] Octave 6 slower then Octave 5 ? |
Date: | Wed, 16 Dec 2020 12:24:35 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/87.0.4280.88 Safari/537.36 Edg/87.0.664.60 |
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #59702 (project octave): Other projects seem to have had a similar experience: https://github.com/openscad/openscad/issues/2744 It looks like they opted to use double-conversion instead of standard library functions because of the quite significant performance benefit. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59702> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |