[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be str
From: |
Markus Mützel |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2022 10:06:15 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/97.0.4692.71 Safari/537.36 Edg/97.0.1072.55 |
Follow-up Comment #19, bug #47627 (project octave):
Maybe, we should backout the change made here.
Instead, we could emit a warning when the format specifier contains any of
"hsfYD".
Something along the lines of:
"Format specifiers for dates should be lower case, format specifiers for time
should be upper case. Possible issue with 'm' (month) and 'M' (minutes)?"
That would probably have helped the original author, too.
That warning could have an id so that a user could turn it off if they prefer
to not see it...
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47627>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter,
Markus Mützel <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/12
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/12
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Rik, 2022/01/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Rik, 2022/01/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2022/01/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Rik, 2022/01/17
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/17