[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be str
From: |
Markus Mützel |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2022 10:19:09 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/97.0.4692.71 Safari/537.36 Edg/97.0.1072.55 |
Follow-up Comment #20, bug #47627 (project octave):
Fwiw, in Matlab R2021a:
>> datenum('Wed 2015-Apr-01 00:00','ddd yyyy-mmm-dd HH:MM')
ans =
736055
>> datenum('1 2015-Apr-01 00:00','d yyyy-mmm-dd HH:MM')
ans =
736055
So two "d" specifiers are allowed in the same date format string.
Alternatively, to what I wrote in comment #19, we could also just remove the
check for duplicate "d" specifiers...
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47627>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/12
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter,
Markus Mützel <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/12
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Rik, 2022/01/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Rik, 2022/01/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2022/01/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Rik, 2022/01/17
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47627] datenum input validation should be stricter, Markus Mützel, 2022/01/17