|
From: | Quentin Spencer |
Subject: | Re: Octave 2.2.x Was: A group in Norway ... |
Date: | Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:42:44 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314 |
John W. Eaton wrote:
I could spend some time on documentation. Before anyone spends a lot of time on it, it would make sense to determine future directions in documentation. There are a few issues I can think of: - Should material from the wiki be periodically merged into the main octave manual, or vice versa, or should they remain separate? - What about good documentation of the C++ interface? That "Da Coda al Fine" document is a good start, but there's much more that could be added, including some things that are on the wiki. Does it make sense to add all of this material to the main manual in a new C++ section? - What about the foreign language issues that were recently discussed on this list? Would changes to octave to accomodate this substantially alter how the documentation is maintained?| * bring the manual up to date (this can be done during | the 2.2.x series) Yes, this is definitely something that needs work, but no one ever seems to want to work on it.
Quentin Spencer
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |