[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More octave-forge functions!!!
From: |
James R. Phillips |
Subject: |
Re: More octave-forge functions!!! |
Date: |
Mon, 29 May 2006 18:28:37 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Bill Denney wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2006, David Bateman wrote:
>
> > For csvread, dlmread, csvwrite, dlmwrite it seems to me there must be a
> > much simpler way of implementing these efficiently in a script file
> > without the need for an oct-file.
>
> I have some m-file versions of csv2cell and cell2csv that I wrote
> independently of the o-f versions. I'll check to see if they look usable
> for csvread, dlmread, csvwrite, and dlmwrite.
>
> Bill
Hm, well I have used the o-f versions of csv2cell and cell2csv, and I like them
very much. There is almost a perfect semantic mapping between a csv file and a
cell array. In comparison csvread and its ilk seem brain dead. I wouldn't
advocate spending a lot of time optimizing them. Just please make sure we
don't lose csv2cell and cell2csv!
- Re: More octave-forge functions!!!, (continued)
- Re: More octave-forge functions!!!, Bill Denney, 2006/05/29
- Re: More octave-forge functions!!!, David Bateman, 2006/05/29
- Re: More octave-forge functions!!!, Alois Schloegl, 2006/05/29
- Re: More octave-forge functions!!!, David Bateman, 2006/05/29
- Re: More octave-forge functions!!!, David Bateman, 2006/05/29
- Re: More octave-forge functions!!!, David Bateman, 2006/05/30
- Re: More octave-forge functions!!!,
James R. Phillips <=
- Re: More octave-forge functions!!!, David Bateman, 2006/05/30