Re: More octave-forge functions!!!

[David Bateman]

Bill Denney wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2006, David Bateman wrote:
> 
>> For csvread, dlmread, csvwrite, dlmwrite it seems to me there must be a
>> much simpler way of implementing these efficiently in a script file
>> without the need for an oct-file.
> 
> 
> I have some m-file versions of csv2cell and cell2csv that I wrote
> independently of the o-f versions.  I'll check to see if they look
> usable for csvread, dlmread, csvwrite, and dlmwrite.
> 
> Bill
> 

Note what I meant here was that fscanf and fprintf are vectorized and so
it should be possible to get almost the same performance with well
vectorized fscanf/fprintf lines as in an oct-file. In any case the
current octave-forge versions should be considered as a baseline against
which to compare the performance of m-file versions..

D.