Re: 3.1 status report

[John W. Eaton]

On  3-Apr-2008, David Bateman wrote:

| John W. Eaton wrote:
| > Is anyone interested in helping to move the control, finance, and
| > quaternion functions into separate packages?
| >
| >   
| Could we leave that till the next 3.1.x release will be marked as
| testing rather than unstable. The reason is that at the moment I
| personally consider than octave-forge should support Octave 3.0.x and
| not 3.1.x.. At the point 3.1.x is marked as testing that should change,
| and some things in octave-forge will need to be changed as well (user
| type mapper function, etc).. That would be the right time to move the
| packages.. Its not an enormous amount of work to move these when we
| decide to..

These packages would not have to be moved to Octave Forge
immediately.  They could be included with Octave itself, at least for
now.

jwe