[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in expm
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in expm |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:31:10 +0200 |
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Marco Caliari <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Can someone create a patch for the expm function in liboctave that is
> > based on this code?
> >
>
> I made the patches with the old diff -u. The changelog is
> 2008-04-23 Marco Caliari <marco.caliari at univr.it>
> * dMatrix.cc (Matrix::expm): Correctly perform reverse permutation.
> * CMatrix.cc (ComplexMatrix::expm): Likewise.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marco
Marco,
I've tried to convert these two diff patches to a hg changeset for
John's convenience, but
the dMatrix.cc patch failed. Did you make the patches against the most
recent sources?
If not, can you please refresh?
thanks,
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
- Bug in expm, Marco Caliari, 2008/04/22
- Bug in expm, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/22
- Re: Bug in expm, Marco Caliari, 2008/04/23
- Re: Bug in expm,
Jaroslav Hajek <=
- Re: Bug in expm, Marco Caliari, 2008/04/24
- Re: Bug in expm, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/24
- Re: Bug in expm, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/26
- Re: Bug in expm, Marco Caliari, 2008/04/26
- Re: Bug in expm, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/26
- Re: Bug in expm, Marco Caliari, 2008/04/27
- Re: Bug in expm, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/29