[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: t-value
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: t-value |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:37:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080306) |
Jonathan Stickel wrote:
>
> I have a couple comments about octave development. Although I am a
> small-fry contributor to open-source projects, mostly octave related,
> I think I generally understand the process. To maintain control, not
> everyone is allowed to check code in directly. That is fine.
> Instead, there is usually a process where everyone can contribute by
> submitting bugs, etc. For octave this is done by submitting patches
> (now changesets) to the lists. JWE and others do a great job
> responding appropriately and checking stuff in. However, this is not
> as transparent as it could be, and occasionally some submissions get
> missed or forgotten, and the contributor doesn't always know the
> status of his/her contribution (take this thread as an example). I
> prefer a web interface bug submission process where all can see and
> keep track of the submissions. I realize effort would be needed to
> set up this type of system, but I think it is worthwhile. What do
> others think?
Sure, I think we all agree.. The only issue is someone to do the work
and having a bug tracker that transparent interfaces to mailed bug
reports .. There was a trial Debian bug tracker for Octave set up
recently. Check the thread
http://www.nabble.com/Debbugs-bugtracker-testbed-for-Octave--to16046283.html
If you feel highly motivated by this issue, I think others here would
cheer you on if you worked on this..
D.
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- Re: t-value, (continued)
- Re: t-value, David Bateman, 2008/04/23
- Re: t-value, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/23
- Re: t-value, Jonathan Stickel, 2008/04/23
- Re: t-value, David Bateman, 2008/04/23
- Re: t-value, Jonathan Stickel, 2008/04/23
- Re: t-value, Jonathan Stickel, 2008/04/28
- Re: t-value, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/28
- Re: t-value, Jonathan Stickel, 2008/04/28
- Re: t-value, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/28
- Re: t-value, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/29
- Re: t-value,
David Bateman <=
- bug tracker [was: Re: t-value], Thomas Weber, 2008/04/29
- bug tracker [was: Re: t-value], John W. Eaton, 2008/04/29