[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type.
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type. |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:06:28 -0400 |
On 29-Apr-2008, David Bateman wrote:
| Well easy is relative it was still a couple of days of solid work.
OK, I didn't mean to trivialize the effort...
| Agreed that there is the issue of maintenance to address, but if there
| has to be specializations for the LAPACK/BLAS codes that won't go away.
| Even functors will just increase the amount of code to maintain in my
| opinion
Yes, and it tends to be fairly complex, so I agree we need to consider
whether it is worth it.
| in that case, and the calling conventions of some complex LAPACK
| functions are not the same as their real counterparts and so the methods
| with functors in those cases could even be included in the
| MArray2/MArrayN classes.
Yes, those would cause trouble. I was thinking about float/double.
Are those at least the same?
| There is also still the issue of the effect
| such changes would have on the maintainability of user types in
| octave-forge.
I guess I was hoping to keep the interfaces of the
Matrix/NDArray/etc. classes the same as they are now. Would it matter
if we added functions to the MArray classes?
jwe
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., (continued)
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., John W. Eaton, 2008/04/28
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/28
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., David Bateman, 2008/04/28
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., John W. Eaton, 2008/04/28
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., John W. Eaton, 2008/04/28
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., John W. Eaton, 2008/04/28
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., John W. Eaton, 2008/04/28
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., David Bateman, 2008/04/29
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type.,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., David Bateman, 2008/04/29
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., David Bateman, 2008/04/30
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., John W. Eaton, 2008/04/30
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., John W. Eaton, 2008/04/30
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., David Bateman, 2008/04/30
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., John W. Eaton, 2008/04/30
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., David Bateman, 2008/04/30
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., John W. Eaton, 2008/04/28
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/28
- Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type., David Bateman, 2008/04/29