[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Further on MEX
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Further on MEX |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:28:52 -0500 |
On 8-Jan-2009, Thomas Weber wrote:
| Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2009, 22:20 +0100 schrieb David Bateman:
| > John W. Eaton wrote:
| > I thought the LSB specified architecture dependent and independent
| > directories
|
| Yes[1].
|
| > and so the mex files should always be in different
| > directories for different platforms if packaged correctly.
|
| No. The platform-specific files go into /usr/lib, platform-independent
| files into /usr/share.
| So, you will have the .mex file in a directory under /usr/lib, but that
| directory name is the same for every architecture.
But aren't they installed in directories with names like
/usr/lib/octave/3.0.3/oct/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/qr.oct
so these files are installed in directories with names derived from
the architecture?
Am I missing something?
jwe
- Re: Further on MEX, (continued)
- Re: Further on MEX, David Bateman, 2009/01/07
- Re: Further on MEX, Aravindh Krishnamoorthy, 2009/01/07
- Re: Further on MEX, David Bateman, 2009/01/07
- Re: Further on MEX, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/07
- Re: Further on MEX, David Bateman, 2009/01/07
- Re: Further on MEX, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/07
- Re: Further on MEX, David Bateman, 2009/01/07
- Re: Further on MEX, Thomas Weber, 2009/01/08
- Re: Further on MEX,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Further on MEX, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/07
- Re: Further on MEX, David Bateman, 2009/01/07
- Re: Further on MEX, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/07
- Re: Further on MEX, David Bateman, 2009/01/06
Re: Further on MEX, Michael Goffioul, 2009/01/04