[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.2.4 call for patches
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: 3.2.4 call for patches |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:45:51 -0500 |
On 25-Nov-2009, WMennerich wrote:
| Hi,
| there are two patches, regarding the object / function handles stuff:
|
| http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/0c7d84a65386
|
| http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/cb0b21f34abc
|
| Are they already applied? (In 3.2.3 (minGW) it does not seem so, regarding a
| short test today)
|
| Discussion about that topic:
|
http://old.nabble.com/Error-with-function-handles-of-object-methods-to24185732.html#a24185732
The second one should be OK. I'm not sure about the first because it
adds class methods. Does that cause trouble for binary compatibility?
If so, then it should not be applied because binary compatibility is a
goal for a release series like 3.2.x.
jwe
- Re: new major release?, (continued)
- Re: new major release?, Michael D. Godfrey, 2009/11/25
- Re: new major release? (was: Re: 3.2.4 call for patches), John W. Eaton, 2009/11/25
- Re: new major release? (was: Re: 3.2.4 call for patches), Shai Ayal, 2009/11/28
- Re: new major release? (was: Re: 3.2.4 call for patches), John W. Eaton, 2009/11/28
- Re: new major release? (was: Re: 3.2.4 call for patches), Ben Abbott, 2009/11/28
- Re: new major release? (was: Re: 3.2.4 call for patches), Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/25
- Re: new major release? (was: Re: 3.2.4 call for patches), John W. Eaton, 2009/11/25
Re: 3.2.4 call for patches [patch for pkg], Alois Schlögl, 2009/11/25
Re: 3.2.4 call for patches, WMennerich, 2009/11/25
- Re: 3.2.4 call for patches,
John W. Eaton <=
Fwd: Re: 3.2.4 call for patches, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/11/24