octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: [Pkg-octave-devel] Popcon stats for the DOG packages


From: PhilipNienhuis
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Pkg-octave-devel] Popcon stats for the DOG packages
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:52:39 -0700 (PDT)

Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso-2 wrote
> 
> I thought the information below might be interesting. Some user
> statistics of which Octave packages get installed the most on Debian.
> Most, but not all, are Octave-Forge packages. It's interesting how
> frequently QtOctave is also installed. About one in 3 Octave
> installations in Debian also seem to install QtOctave.
> 
> - Jordi G. H.
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@>
> Date: 10 March 2012 06:21
> Subject: [Pkg-octave-devel] Popcon stats for the DOG packages
> To: Debian Octave Group <address@hidden>
> 
> 
> You will find below the list of the DOG packages ordered in decreasing
> order of popularity-contest.  It was produced by this (quite
> convoluted) one-line shell code:
> 
>  curl
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-octave-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org
> \
>    | perl -ne 'if (/ /) {print $1} if (m{ popcon.php\?package=[^ (\d+) })
> {print (" $1\n")}' \
>    | perl -ne 'if (/(.*) (\d+)/) {print ("$2 $1\n")}' \
>    | sort -nr
> 
> This will help us to know on which packages we should concentrate our
> efforts for the 3.6 transition.
> 
> Rafael
> 
> 3742 octave3.2
> 1204 octave-miscellaneous
> 1030 octave-optim
> 983 octave-control
> 941 qtoctave
> 864 octave-specfun
> 818 octave-signal
> 776 octave-gsl
> 767 octave-struct
> 703 octave-statistics
> 616 octave-plot
> 595 octave-linear-algebra
> 541 octave-io
> 528 octave-general
> 518 octave-image
> 496 octave-splines
> 464 octave-missing-functions
> 454 octave-symbolic
> 446 octave-strings
> 419 octave-odepkg
> 407 octave-communications
> 387 octave-audio
> 386 octave-time
> 381 octave-nan
> 365 octave-parallel
> 353 octave-epstk
> 347 octave-multicore
> 347 octave-combinatorics
> 333 octave-physicalconstants
> 331 octave-data-smoothing
> 329 octave-optiminterp
> 305 octave-informationtheory
> 302 octave-tsa
> 298 octave-ad
> 285 octave-fixed
> 278 octave-octgpr
> 263 octave
> 260 octave-zenity
> 260 octave-financial
> 258 octave-econometrics
> 254 octave-ident
> 253 octave-irsa
> 251 octave-nnet
> 251 octave-ga
> 249 semidef-oct
> 249 octave-outliers
> 244 octave-vrml
> 241 octave-integration
> 230 octave-sockets
> 228 octave-octcdf
> 218 octave-ftp
> 213 octave-fpl
> 206 octave-mapping
> 206 octave-benchmark
> 202 octave-ocs
> 195 octave-nurbs
> 190 octave-bioinfo
> 189 octave-simp
> 185 octave-symband
> 165 octave-msh
> 158 octave-nlwing2
> 155 octave-secs2d
> 154 octave-secs1d
> 149 octave-pdb
> 137 octave-bim
> 118 octave-ann
> 115 octave-pkg-dev
> 103 octave-xraylib
> 54 dynare
> 35 octave-java
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-octave-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-octave-devel
> 

Intriguing to see the io pkg at 541 "units" (whatever "units" means), and
the java pkg at just 35, while the java package is a dependency for io on
non-windows systems....

Philip

--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-Pkg-octave-devel-Popcon-stats-for-the-DOG-packages-tp4462882p4464086.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]