Re: [octave:package-releases] #43 msh-1.0.7

[c.]

On 4 Jul 2013, at 11:40, c. <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
> On 4 Jul 2013, at 11:25, Marco <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> 2) shouldn't dolfin be mentioned as build requirements on the DESCRIPTION 
>> file?
> How can it be marked as an OPTIONAL requirement?
> 
> I don't want the DEBIAN packagers to jump in and say they will discard msh 
> from their distribution because of the missing requirement ...
> 
>> Also, I though those functions were going to be part of the new fem-dolfin 
>> package.
> fem-fenics has been preferred to fem-dolfin, fenics is a set of tools 
> including dolfin and ufl, as the package uses both it seems better to use the 
> collective name.
> 
> c.

Hi,
I had to make a small change to Makefile.in in order for installation to work 
on Mac OSX,
please make sure my last commit is included when you release the package.
c.