Re: QtHandles and atomic reference

[John W. Eaton]

On 02/21/2014 03:59 PM, Michael Goffioul wrote:
> This topic has already been discussed in the past. But with the recent
> inclusion of QtHandles into octave source tree, did you (jwe) take a
> decision? I didn't see anything in the changeset that indicates atomic
> reference is turned on when using QtHandles. Did you find another work
> around?
>
> Just asking as otherwise, you can expect a bunch of bug reports with
> octave crashing when doing this or that.

No, I didn't do anything about this problem yet, primarily because I 
forgot about it.  But even if I had remembered, I might have gone ahead 
with the merge anyway just to get things moving along.

jwe