octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: help needed to verify expected behavior for scripts and nested funct


From: Markus Mützel
Subject: Re: help needed to verify expected behavior for scripts and nested functions
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:57:09 +0200

Am 08. April 2020 um 17:25 Uhr schrieb "John W. Eaton":
> On 4/8/20 11:18 AM, "Markus Mützel" wrote:
> 
> > Maybe this resource can help understanding their precedence order handling:
> > https://de.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab_prog/function-precedence-order.html
> > 
> > In particular "3. Nested functions within the current function". Looks like 
> > the script is *not* "within the current function".
> > But what that really means is not entirely clear to me either from reading 
> > just the documentation.
> 
> Yes, I know about that list.  It's just confusing that a script appears 
> to be sort of like an include file but not.

Is it possible that there are file(s) missing from the changeset adding 
related(?) BISTs?
I can't find "script_nest_2":
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/7567413e7246

Markus



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]