[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] FlightGear not working

From: Eric Parsonage
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] FlightGear not working
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 17:28:17 +1030


The correct solution is for us to persuade FlightGear to pack there structure 
consistently in the same way for both 32 and 64 bit versions. 

We sometimes run flightgear on another computer which may be either 32 or 64 

If they fix the packing at their end then any software that talks to it will 
not have to consider if it is a 32 or 64 bit flightgear.


On 07/12/2011, at 5:23 PM, Eduard Iten wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> Hi Eric,
> I was surprised myself, to be honest. Yesterday evening, I tried to
> figure out why this happens, but I could not find a final answer yet.
> I'm really confused.
> Regards, Edi
> Am 06.12.2011 22:10, schrieb Eric Parsonage:
>> Eduard
>> I am surprised you find this does not work.
>> The structure packing would naturally be pack(8) when built on
>> linux with a 64 bit compiler. ie you dont need to tell it to do any
>> special alignment because it will be aligned on 8 byte boundaries
>> anyway otherwise integers (which take 8 bytes in 64bit)  would not
>> be aligned in memory.
>> Eric
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO3w2DAAoJELogHzrHo8cKOi4H/0v/vJNpmrb8va8thGIVfsr8
> YEvsmA7RnCNl5mEe3BxwOl2Z4ab33HTETTA9ALRRqEnpjNLSnLNzkR4Di/vWbtAR
> jLqVkku0iCClQWMiwRiQVK6WmGSohkO0jk/EQvwWBBtIFiS8rYw4+j5mIo6UxmrQ
> bMakUBcFexJQk3nzigotgaiAvh5Kndr32JTlfFr+xL/ekkoXeywdTIHWAa/NCSlA
> oI2ji64vVfGWXq0XDVafZPdc8/QONHjDd7SE+tzh8SpfD+XH27ucVeyH8YsymYIo
> ys96so0IoQPkI1F6B45TF9T+NapsFkPz95irTSmC2JtrUSfLcr/8wmBLkaYJESc=
> =nnYr
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]