[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] hexacopter imu

From: Felix Ruess
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] hexacopter imu
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:40:19 +0200

Hi Eduardo,

that would be great, which IMU/breakout board do you have?
I committed a subsystem (master and v5.0) for the Drotek 10DOF V2 board, but it is untested (e.g. the axes assignment might be wrong...)
That would be the <subsystem name="imu" type="drotek_10dof_v2"/> and by default it's on i2c0 on the lpc and i2c2 on the stm32.
E.g. <configure name="DROTEK_2_I2C_DEV" value="i2c1"/> to have it on i2c1.

Cheers, Felix

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Eduardo lavratti <address@hidden> wrote:
i can test it.

Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:52:59 +0200
From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] hexacopter imu

Hi Chris,

I never did a proper comparison... While I personally prefer SPI (if possible), you can definitely also use the I2C version (but maybe not with the max output frequency).
In fact I would like to have some testers for the new/refactored mpu60x0_i2c peripheral ;-)

Cheers, Felix

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Chris <address@hidden> wrote:
I lately have a terrible desire to build my first rotorcraft (hexacopter) so i want to ask anyone that might know if i need to use the SPI version of aspirin or i can also use an i2c imu like the drotek?
I know that SPI is way faster but i don't know if this speed is essential or not.

Paparazzi-devel mailing list

_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden

Paparazzi-devel mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]