[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [paragui-dev] CVS tree doesn't build - what version to develop again
From: |
Alexander Pipelka |
Subject: |
Re: [paragui-dev] CVS tree doesn't build - what version to develop against? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:28:16 +0100 |
Please post the error log. It's impossible to guess the compilation
error. But i think it could be some version mismatch of libsigc++.
Please also post your compiler versions.
The CVS version is very stable. It's used by myself in production
environments.
Am Montag, den 19.12.2005, 00:07 +0100 schrieb Phillip Jordan:
> Hi,
>
> We're intending to use ParaGUI for the pre-game GUI in our project
> 'Hostile Takeover'. For this, I need to make a few modifications to fit
> our needs, such as creating another widget and such.
>
> However, the latest source release, 1.1.8 seems to have a couple of
> severe bugs, which cause some of the test programs to segfault. (run
> them in Valgrind and be very very afraid...)
> Clearly, I wouldn't want to build our game on top of something that's
> known to be broken, so I checked out the CVS tree to see whether any of
> it was fixed there, but I've just given up trying to compile it, after
> fixing one compile error just triggered another one a couple of lines
> later, which had me busy for about an hour with no notable success.
>
> The file that's been causing most of the compilation errors,
> 'include/pgsignals.h', was last modified more than half a year ago,
> according to
>
> http://cvs.savannah.nongnu.org/viewcvs/paragui/include/pgsignals.h?rev=1.8&root=paragui&view=log
>
> which raises the question of the extent to which ParaGUI is still
> maintained? Is there a CVS revision I can check out which is known to be
> reasonably stable and at least actually works, or should I just stick
> with fixing and then extending 1.1.8? Or even something from the 1.0.x tree?
>
> I was planning to roll any fixes or enhancements back into the official
> tree (where desired by the maintainers) but given how much seems to have
> changed since 1.1.8, I doubt that would work unless I kept up to date
> with CVS.
>
> Is there something I've missed concerning the compilation errors? It
> fails right near the start of pgsignals.h because a bunch of things
> haven't been declared or defined. Some of it is commented out, but
> re-enabling that code just causes further errors, etc.
>
> Thoughts? Recommendations? ParaGUI seems great in terms of feature set
> and quality of the documentation, though I've spent quite a lot of time
> trying to get it to actually work so far, with limited success...
>
> ~phil
> _______________________________________________
> paragui-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paragui-dev
--
Alexander Pipelka
BMS Bayer GmbH
Thimiggasse 35/12
A-1180 Wien
Phone: +43 1 524 81 3400
Fax: +43 1 524 81 3480
Web: www.bms-austria.com