phpgroupware-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Phpgroupware-tracker] [bugs #4083] Possible class name typo


From: Dr. Christian Böttger
Subject: [Phpgroupware-tracker] [bugs #4083] Possible class name typo
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 04:53:24 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.2; Linux 2.4.21-202-default; X11; i686; de, address@hidden) (KHTML, like Gecko)

This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: phpGroupWare.

/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #4083] Latest Modifications:

Changes by: 
                Dr. Christian Böttger <address@hidden>
'Date: 
                Wed 04/21/04 at 08:53 (Europe/Berlin)

            What     | Removed                   | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Assigned to | angles                    | None


------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
no email application maintainer available






/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #4083] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=4083>
Project: phpGroupWare
Submitted by: Kai Hofmann
On: Tue 06/24/03 at 12:49

Category:  API - phpGWapi
Item Group:  devel cvs
Severity:  5 - Average
Priority:  5 - Normal
Resolution:  None
Assigned to:  None
Status:  Open
Component Version:  CVS
Platform Version:  MS Windows
Reproducibility:  Every Time


Summary:  Possible class name typo

Original Submission:  Within class.msg_base_sock.inc.php I found

class att_parameter {...} thats ok - later on I found:

function get_att_name($de_part)
 {
  $param = new parameter;

Maybe "parameter" is a typo here or is it a dependency on the nntp 
class.mail.inc.php?



Follow-up Comments
------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed 04/21/04 at 08:53         By: cboettger
no email application maintainer available

-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri 10/24/03 at 07:30         By: powerstat
Not sure - that was from an code review - does nobody know if
it should be "new att_parameter" ???

-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu 10/23/03 at 21:40         By: pooh_
Is this still a problem?

-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu 10/23/03 at 21:39         By: pooh_
Is this still a problem?












For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=4083>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]