Re: new .pot file?

[John Darrington]

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 11:36:09AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
     Yes, that works too.
     
     Before I do that, I'd like to get the following problems fixed.  John,
     can you take a look?  Thanks.

I've fixed those warnings.  But can we hold off on a release for a little bit?  
I'm not
entirely happy with that dialog box behaviour and I think it needs more work.

Also it would be great to have some more people test the recent MATRIX DATA 
command
and the related /MATRIX subcommand for FACTOR.

J'
     
     ../src/ui/gui/psppire-dialog-action-k-independent.c:146:56: error: passing 
argument 1 of ???psppire_dialog_run??? from incompatible pointer type 
[-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
        if (PSPPIRE_RESPONSE_CONTINUE == psppire_dialog_run (kid->subdialog))
                                                             ^~~
     In file included from ../src/ui/gui/psppire-dialog-action.h:36:0,
                      from 
../src/ui/gui/psppire-dialog-action-k-independent.h:21,
                      from 
../src/ui/gui/psppire-dialog-action-k-independent.c:20:
     ../src/ui/gui/psppire-dialog.h:74:16: note: expected ???PsppireDialog * 
{aka struct _PsppireDialog *}??? but argument is of type ???GtkWidget * {aka 
struct _GtkWidget *}???
      gint           psppire_dialog_run             (PsppireDialog *);
                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     ../src/ui/gui/psppire-dialog-action-k-independent.c: In function 
???set_value_entry_variable???:
     ../src/ui/gui/psppire-dialog-action-k-independent.c:166:37: error: passing 
argument 1 of ???psppire_value_entry_set_variable??? from incompatible pointer 
type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
        psppire_value_entry_set_variable (kid->lower_limit_entry, v);
                                          ^~~
     In file included from 
../src/ui/gui/psppire-dialog-action-k-independent.c:23:0:
     ../src/ui/gui/psppire-value-entry.h:78:6: note: expected 
???PsppireValueEntry * {aka struct _PsppireValueEntry *}??? but argument is of 
type ???GtkWidget * {aka struct _GtkWidget *}???
      void psppire_value_entry_set_variable (PsppireValueEntry *,
           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     ../src/ui/gui/psppire-dialog-action-k-independent.c:167:37: error: passing 
argument 1 of ???psppire_value_entry_set_variable??? from incompatible pointer 
type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
        psppire_value_entry_set_variable (kid->upper_limit_entry, v);
                                          ^~~
     In file included from 
../src/ui/gui/psppire-dialog-action-k-independent.c:23:0:
     ../src/ui/gui/psppire-value-entry.h:78:6: note: expected 
???PsppireValueEntry * {aka struct _PsppireValueEntry *}??? but argument is of 
type ???GtkWidget * {aka struct _GtkWidget *}???
      void psppire_value_entry_set_variable (PsppireValueEntry *,
           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     
     
     On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 07:02:14PM +0200, Harry Thijssen wrote:
     > Hi
     > 
     > The translationproject accepts names like  pspp-0.10.4-pre1  This gives 
the
     > translators the time to translate before a release so the translation can
     > be included in the release.
     > 
     > I agree that a new release might be useful as the current version is 
rather
     > old.
     > 
     > Have fun
     > 
     > 2017-05-20 18:27 GMT+02:00 Ben Pfaff <address@hidden>:
     > 
     > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 03:54:19PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
     > > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 09:59:59AM +0200, Harry Thijssen wrote:
     > > >      Hi
     > > >
     > > >      Currently the actual .pot file in master and the .pot file in 
the
     > > >      translationproject differ significantly. I guess it is not the
     > > right time
     > > >      to bring out a new pspp version yet, but it might be a good 
idea to
     > > upload
     > > >      a newer .pot version to the translationproject so the 
translators
     > > can work
     > > >      against the newer .pot file.
     > > >
     > > >      What do you think?
     > > >
     > > > I suppose Ben could advise translationproject to take the pot file 
from
     > > one of
     > > > his nightly builds:  Eg:
     > > >
     > > > https://benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master/20170519030501/
     > > source/pspp-0.10.4-g59adca.tar.gz
     > >
     > > I can't do it that way, because the translationproject is very picky
     > > about the format of version numbers, but we could increment the version
     > > to 0.10.5 or 0.10.4.1, etc.  Or we could actually release 0.10.4,
     > > especially since it's been a long time since the last release.
     > >
     > > What do you think?
     > >

-- 
Avoid eavesdropping.  Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature