[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] abt.c: Permit NULL as the reaugment argument.
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] abt.c: Permit NULL as the reaugment argument. |
Date: |
Sun, 19 May 2019 21:03:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:24:20AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 02:48:45PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> I wanted a binary tree structure, but didn't need the augmentation
feature.
> Okay to push this change?
Would you mind saying a few words about why this is useful? I would
guess that, if reaugmentation is not needed, then it would make more
sense to use another data structure, such as plain bt.[ch].
I guess you're right. Bizarrely, I hadn't realized that bt.[ch]
existed.
Thanks.
--
Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature