[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Block layer meeting notes from June 10/11
From: |
Benoît Canet |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Block layer meeting notes from June 10/11 |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:49:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
The Friday 13 Jun 2014 à 16:17:34 (+0200), Benoît Canet wrote :
> The Friday 13 Jun 2014 à 09:53:55 (-0400), Jeff Cody wrote :
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:28:28PM +0800, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > * Mutual exclusion of operations/background jobs (bs->in_use /
> > > BlockOpType)
> > > * Streaming in two different parts of the backing chain - allowed?
> > > (Benoît though that not, but does anything break?)
> > > * Does streaming only require that streamed images stay read-only
> > > (i.e. backing chain segment on which the operation is performed)
> > > * Live commit in the opposite direction at the same time?
> > >
> > > Action:
> > > * Draw up matrix of operations (mirror, stream, resize, etc)
> > > * Make op blocker mechanism use matrix as data instead of code
> > > (define an array)
> > > * Enforce that new QMP/QAPI commands and block jobs add themselves to
> > > the matrix
> > > * Recursively add blockers to child nodes (driver method?) [Benoit]
> > >
> >
> > Benoit, you have quite a few items on your list - would it be useful
> > if I worked on this? It would dovetail nicely with the node-name
> > commit/stream patches.
Still I need to do some work in order to bill my customer ;)
>
> Ok as you want tell me want you want to take I'll do the rest.
>
> Best regards
>
> Benoît
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff
> >