qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] cirrus.yml: Exclude some targets in the FreeBSD job to speed


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cirrus.yml: Exclude some targets in the FreeBSD job to speed up the build
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:54:16 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0

On 28/08/2020 10.59, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:44:10AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The FreeBSD jobs currently hit the 1h time limit in the Cirrus-CI.
>> We've got to exclude some build targets here to make sure that the job
>> finishes in time again. The targets that are excluded should not hurt
>> much, since e.g. all the code from i386-softmmu is covered again by
>> x86_64-softmmu.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  Not sure why the FreeBSD builds suddenly got slower and hit the 1h
>>  time limit now. Looking at https://cirrus-ci.com/github/qemu/qemu
>>  it seems like the FreeBSD jobs were already taking ca. 48 minutes
>>  since quite a while, but since the Meson build system has been merged,
>>  they now always hit the 1h limit. Could it be that Meson is slow on
>>  FreeBSD?
>>  
>>  I hope disabling some of the "redundant" targets is ok for everybody
>>  to get this working again. Alternatively, we could also introduce a
>>  second FreeBSD job and run half of the targets in one job, and half
>>  of the targets in the other job if that's preferred?
> 
> I'd probably suggest we go for two jobs, as there doesn't look like
> any constraint on running multiple jobs that we'll hit any time
> soon.

I gave it a try, but either I'm doing something wrong, or it is not
possible to run multiple FreeBSD tasks on cirrus-ci for one commit -
either the second task does not show up, or both FreeBSD tasks do not
show up here. I assume there are some limitations in place (see
https://cirrus-ci.org/faq/#are-there-any-limits), but it even does not
work for me when I limit the number of cpus in the tasks to a lower
value like 4 or 2.

Could somebody else please have a try? Maybe I'm just doing something
stupid here...

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]