qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracetool: fix "PRI" macro decoding


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracetool: fix "PRI" macro decoding
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:44:22 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0

On 1/5/21 8:17 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> macro is not reset after use, so the format decoded is always the
> one of the first "PRI" in the format string.
> 
> For instance:
> 
>   vhost_vdpa_set_config(void *dev, uint32_t offset, uint32_t size, \
>                         uint32_t flags) "dev: %p offset: %"PRIu32" \
>                         size: %"PRIu32" flags: 0x%"PRIx32
> 
> generates:
> 
>   printf("%d@%d vhost_vdpa_set_config dev: %p offset: %u size: %u \
>           flags: 0x%u\n", pid(), gettimeofday_ns(), dev, offset, \
>           size, flags)
> 
> for the "flags" parameter, we can see a "0x%u" rather than a "0x%x"
> because the first macro was "PRIu32" (for offset).
> 
> In the loop, macro becomes "PRIu32PRIu32PRIx32", and c_macro_to_format()
> returns always macro[3] ('u' in this case). This patch resets macro after
> the format has been decoded.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> ---
>  scripts/tracetool/format/log_stap.py | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/tracetool/format/log_stap.py 
> b/scripts/tracetool/format/log_stap.py
> index b486beb67239..3e1186ae9cc2 100644
> --- a/scripts/tracetool/format/log_stap.py
> +++ b/scripts/tracetool/format/log_stap.py
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ def c_fmt_to_stap(fmt):
>              else:
>                  if state == STATE_MACRO:
>                      bits.append(c_macro_to_format(macro))
> +                    macro = ""
>                  state = STATE_LITERAL
>          elif fmt[i] == ' ' or fmt[i] == '\t':
>              if state == STATE_MACRO:

What about the 'else' case?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]