qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 16/21] hw/timer: Refactor NPCM7XX Timer to use CLK clock


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PULL 16/21] hw/timer: Refactor NPCM7XX Timer to use CLK clock
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:39:41 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 6:20 PM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
wrote:
>
> From: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
>
> This patch makes NPCM7XX Timer to use a the timer clock generated by the
> CLK module instead of the magic number TIMER_REF_HZ.
>
> Reviewed-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tyrone Ting <kfting@nuvoton.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
> Message-id: 20210108190945.949196-3-wuhaotsh@google.com
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_clk.h    |  6 -----
>  include/hw/timer/npcm7xx_timer.h |  1 +
>  hw/arm/npcm7xx.c                 |  5 ++++
>  hw/timer/npcm7xx_timer.c         | 39 +++++++++++++++-----------------
>  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Is that a spurious error (building with Clang)?

Running test qtest-arm/npcm7xx_timer-test
ERROR:../tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c:475:test_periodic_interrupt:
assertion failed (tim_read(td, TISR) == tim_timer_bit(td)): (0x00000000
== 0x00000004)
ERROR:../tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c:476:test_periodic_interrupt:
'qtest_get_irq(global_qtest, tim_timer_irq(td))' should be TRUE
FAIL 155 qtest-arm/npcm7xx_timer-test
/arm/npcm7xx_timer/tim[2]/timer[2]/periodic_interrupt
make: *** [Makefile.mtest:1033: run-test-127] Error 1



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]