[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC v1 24/38] target/arm: move aa64_va_parameter_tbi,tbid,tcma and
|
From: |
Richard Henderson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [RFC v1 24/38] target/arm: move aa64_va_parameter_tbi,tbid,tcma and arm_rebuild_hflags |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:30:15 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 2/23/21 2:07 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> is the code elimination for "if (0)" a guarantee, ie, we won't encounter
> compiler or compiler-options differences, for the compilers we support?
Yes, it's a guarantee.
> Is there some way to force the compilers to not even look at what is in the
> if (0) block?
No, it must be syntactically correct, and it must not reference variables that
have not been declared. But that's a feature -- making sure that nothing has
syntax errors in is a major improvement over ifdefs.
> That should work also with --enable-debug?
Yes.
> This way we could avoid a lot of boilerplate/stubs...
Eh, maybe, maybe not. Stubs may still be required, depending on how complex
the condition is -- more than if (0).
r~