Re: [PATCH 5/8] ppc/pnv: Add an assert when calculating the RAM distribution on chips

[David Gibson]

On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:41:50AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>

Uh.. I thought the proposed assert was about making it clear there
wouldn't be a divide by zero, which would want > 1, not < 2.

> ---
>  hw/ppc/pnv.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> index a62e90b15e27..761b82be7401 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> @@ -723,6 +723,8 @@ static uint64_t pnv_chip_get_ram_size(PnvMachineState 
> *pnv, int chip_id)
>          return QEMU_ALIGN_DOWN(ram_per_chip, 1 * MiB);
>      }
>  
> +    assert(pnv->num_chips < 2);
> +
>      ram_per_chip = (machine->ram_size - 1 * GiB) / (pnv->num_chips - 1);
>      return chip_id == 0 ? 1 * GiB : QEMU_ALIGN_DOWN(ram_per_chip, 1 * MiB);
>  }

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature