qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 06/35] hw/acpi: refactor acpi hp modules so that targets can j


From: Ani Sinha
Subject: Re: [PULL 06/35] hw/acpi: refactor acpi hp modules so that targets can just use what they need
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 16:19:11 +0530

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:54 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/6/21 12:03 PM, Ani Sinha wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Sep 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> On 9/4/21 11:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> From: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
> >>>
> >>> Currently various acpi hotplug modules like cpu hotplug, memory hotplug, 
> >>> pci
> >>> hotplug, nvdimm hotplug are all pulled in when CONFIG_ACPI_X86 is turned 
> >>> on.
> >>> This brings in support for whole lot of subsystems that some targets like
> >>> mips does not need. They are added just to satisfy symbol dependencies. 
> >>> This
> >>> is ugly and should be avoided. Targets should be able to pull in just 
> >>> what they
> >>> need and no more. For example, mips only needs support for PIIX4 and does 
> >>> not
> >>> need acpi pci hotplug support or cpu hotplug support or memory hotplug 
> >>> support
> >>> etc. This change is an effort to clean this up.
> >>> In this change, new config variables are added for various acpi hotplug
> >>> subsystems. Targets like mips can only enable PIIX4 support and not the 
> >>> rest
> >>> of all the other modules which were being previously pulled in as a part 
> >>> of
> >>> CONFIG_ACPI_X86. Function stubs make sure that symbols which piix4 needs 
> >>> but
> >>> are not required by mips (for example, symbols specific to pci hotplug 
> >>> etc)
> >>> are available to satisfy the dependencies.
> >>>
> >>> Currently, this change only addresses issues with mips malta targets. In 
> >>> future
> >>> we might be able to clean up other targets which are similarly pulling in 
> >>> lot
> >>> of unnecessary hotplug modules by enabling ACPI_X86.
> >>>
> >>> This change should also address issues such as the following:
> >>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/221
> >>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/193
> >>
> >> FYI per 
> >> https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/administration/issue_closing_pattern.html
> >> this should have been:
> >>
> >> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/193
> >> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/221
> >>
> >
> > Ah my apologies. Will do this next time.
> >
> >> Can we close these issues manually?
> >
> > Since both you and I have verified that those issues gets fixed with my
> > change, yes we can close them. I do not have a gitlab account. Should I
> > have one? Is there special permissions needed to handle these tickets?
>
> Since you are listed in the MAINTAINERS file, long-term you'll
> eventually use it anyway (i.e. to run the CI pipelines before sending
> patches, to subscribe to the 'ACPI' label to get notifications or
> comment ACPI-related issues).
>
> The process is quite straight-forward, once having an account you
> simply request to be member of the project via the WebUI then you
> can help triaging the issues (and closing these two).

Hmm. I created an account and added a comment to the tickets. However
I am unable to close them. I requested access to the project.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]