[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 05/10] target/arm: Honour MDCR_EL2.HPMD in Secure EL2
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 05/10] target/arm: Honour MDCR_EL2.HPMD in Secure EL2 |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2022 20:09:01 +0100 |
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 at 18:48, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
> You can use |= for bool as well. You don't need the short-circuting of ||
> here.
That seems like the kind of thing that -Wbool-operation is likely to
warn about either now or in future, though...
-- PMM
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] target/arm: Correct value returned by pmu_counter_mask(), (continued)
- [PATCH 06/10] target/arm: Detect overflow when calculating next PMU interrupt, Peter Maydell, 2022/08/11
- [PATCH 03/10] target/arm: Don't mishandle count when enabling or disabling PMU counters, Peter Maydell, 2022/08/11
- [PATCH 08/10] target/arm: Implement FEAT_PMUv3p5 cycle counter disable bits, Peter Maydell, 2022/08/11
- [PATCH 05/10] target/arm: Honour MDCR_EL2.HPMD in Secure EL2, Peter Maydell, 2022/08/11
- [PATCH 04/10] target/arm: Ignore PMCR.D when PMCR.LC is set, Peter Maydell, 2022/08/11
- [PATCH 07/10] target/arm: Rename pmu_8_n feature test functions, Peter Maydell, 2022/08/11
- [PATCH 10/10] target/arm: Report FEAT_PMUv3p5 for TCG '-cpu max', Peter Maydell, 2022/08/11
- [PATCH 09/10] target/arm: Support 64-bit event counters for FEAT_PMUv3p5, Peter Maydell, 2022/08/11