Re: [PULL 00/13] testing updates (gitlab, cirrus, docker, avocado, windows)

[Alex Bennée]

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 21:23, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> 
> wrote:
>>
>> On 24/2/23 20:52, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> >
>> > Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 15:57, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> The following changes since commit 
>> >>> 79b677d658d3d35e1e776826ac4abb28cdce69b8:
>> >>>
>> >>>    Merge tag 'net-pull-request' of https://github.com/jasowang/qemu
>> >>> into staging (2023-02-21 11:28:31 +0000)
>> >>>
>> >>> are available in the Git repository at:
>> >>>
>> >>>    https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu.git tags/pull-testing-next-230223-1
>> >>>
>> >>> for you to fetch changes up to e9969376f01180d7bcbee25ae8333983da7eda2c:
>> >>>
>> >>>    cirrus.yml: Improve the windows_msys2_task (2023-02-23 15:48:23 +0000)
>> >>>
>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> testing updates:
>> >>>
>> >>>    - ensure socat available for tests
>> >>>    - skip socat tests for MacOS
>> >>>    - properly clean up fifos after use
>> >>>    - make fp-test less chatty
>> >>>    - store test artefacts on Cirrus
>> >>>    - control custom runners with QEMU_CI knobs
>> >>>    - disable benchmark runs under tsan build
>> >>>    - update ubuntu 2004 to 2204
>> >>>    - skip nios2 kernel replay test
>> >>>    - add tuxrun baselines to avocado
>> >>>    - binary build of tricore tools
>> >>>    - export test results on cross builds
>> >>>    - improve windows builds
>> >>>
>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> So I've been applying pullreqs relying on a combination of the
>> >> private-runner CI jobs plus using the free minutes allowance
>> >> on my personal gitlab account, and ad-hoc local builds. I'm
>> >> a bit reluctant to do that for this one though, because it's
>> >> touching all the gitlab config and we won't be able test that
>> >> that is OK until we can do a full run with the standard config.
>> >> What do you think ?
>>
>> What is the alternative, waiting 5 days up to March 1st?
>
> That would be the other option, yes.

As the PR needs a re-base anyway please drop this and I'll respin with
the additional patches from yesterday's testing/next post.

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro