[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v15 4/4] vhost-vdpa: Add support for vIOMMU.
|
From: |
Jason Wang |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v15 4/4] vhost-vdpa: Add support for vIOMMU. |
|
Date: |
Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:47:13 +0800 |
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 10:24 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> 1. The vIOMMU support will make vDPA can work in IOMMU mode. This
> will fix security issues while using the no-IOMMU mode.
> To support this feature we need to add new functions for IOMMU MR adds and
> deletes.
>
> Also since the SVQ does not support vIOMMU yet, add the check for IOMMU
> in vhost_vdpa_dev_start, if the SVQ and IOMMU enable at the same time
> the function will return fail.
>
> 2. Skip the iova_max check vhost_vdpa_listener_skipped_section(). While
> MR is IOMMU, move this check to vhost_vdpa_iommu_map_notify()
>
> Verified in vp_vdpa and vdpa_sim_net driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/trace-events | 2 +-
> hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h | 11 +++
> 3 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/trace-events b/hw/virtio/trace-events
> index 8f8d05cf9b..de4da2c65c 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/virtio/trace-events
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ vhost_user_create_notifier(int idx, void *n) "idx:%d n:%p"
> vhost_vdpa_dma_map(void *vdpa, int fd, uint32_t msg_type, uint32_t asid,
> uint64_t iova, uint64_t size, uint64_t uaddr, uint8_t perm, uint8_t type)
> "vdpa:%p fd: %d msg_type: %"PRIu32" asid: %"PRIu32" iova: 0x%"PRIx64" size:
> 0x%"PRIx64" uaddr: 0x%"PRIx64" perm: 0x%"PRIx8" type: %"PRIu8
> vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(void *vdpa, int fd, uint32_t msg_type, uint32_t asid,
> uint64_t iova, uint64_t size, uint8_t type) "vdpa:%p fd: %d msg_type:
> %"PRIu32" asid: %"PRIu32" iova: 0x%"PRIx64" size: 0x%"PRIx64" type: %"PRIu8
> vhost_vdpa_listener_begin_batch(void *v, int fd, uint32_t msg_type, uint8_t
> type) "vdpa:%p fd: %d msg_type: %"PRIu32" type: %"PRIu8
> -vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(void *v, int fd, uint32_t msg_type, uint8_t type)
> "vdpa:%p fd: %d msg_type: %"PRIu32" type: %"PRIu8
> +vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_end_once(void *v, int fd, uint32_t msg_type, uint8_t
> type) "vdpa:%p fd: %d msg_type: %"PRIu32" type: %"PRIu8
> vhost_vdpa_listener_region_add(void *vdpa, uint64_t iova, uint64_t llend,
> void *vaddr, bool readonly) "vdpa: %p iova 0x%"PRIx64" llend 0x%"PRIx64"
> vaddr: %p read-only: %d"
> vhost_vdpa_listener_region_del(void *vdpa, uint64_t iova, uint64_t llend)
> "vdpa: %p iova 0x%"PRIx64" llend 0x%"PRIx64
> vhost_vdpa_add_status(void *dev, uint8_t status) "dev: %p status: 0x%"PRIx8
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> index 0c8c37e786..39720d12a6 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include "cpu.h"
> #include "trace.h"
> #include "qapi/error.h"
> +#include "hw/virtio/virtio-access.h"
>
> /*
> * Return one past the end of the end of section. Be careful with uint64_t
> @@ -60,13 +61,21 @@ static bool
> vhost_vdpa_listener_skipped_section(MemoryRegionSection *section,
> iova_min, section->offset_within_address_space);
> return true;
> }
> + /*
> + * While using vIOMMU, sometimes the section will be larger than
> iova_max,
> + * but the memory that actually maps is smaller, so move the check to
> + * function vhost_vdpa_iommu_map_notify(). That function will use the
> actual
> + * size that maps to the kernel
> + */
>
> - llend = vhost_vdpa_section_end(section);
> - if (int128_gt(llend, int128_make64(iova_max))) {
> - error_report("RAM section out of device range (max=0x%" PRIx64
> - ", end addr=0x%" PRIx64 ")",
> - iova_max, int128_get64(llend));
> - return true;
> + if (!memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) {
> + llend = vhost_vdpa_section_end(section);
> + if (int128_gt(llend, int128_make64(iova_max))) {
> + error_report("RAM section out of device range (max=0x%" PRIx64
> + ", end addr=0x%" PRIx64 ")",
> + iova_max, int128_get64(llend));
> + return true;
> + }
> }
>
> return false;
> @@ -158,9 +167,8 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_begin_once(struct
> vhost_vdpa *v)
> v->iotlb_batch_begin_sent = true;
> }
>
> -static void vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
> +static void vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_end_once(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
> {
> - struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(listener, struct vhost_vdpa,
> listener);
> struct vhost_dev *dev = v->dev;
> struct vhost_msg_v2 msg = {};
> int fd = v->device_fd;
> @@ -176,7 +184,7 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(MemoryListener
> *listener)
> msg.type = v->msg_type;
> msg.iotlb.type = VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_END;
>
> - trace_vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(v, fd, msg.type, msg.iotlb.type);
> + trace_vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_end_once(v, fd, msg.type, msg.iotlb.type);
I suggest to keep the commit trace. The commit and batch are different
things. If you want to trace the batch begin/end you should do it in
vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_begin_once() etc.
> if (write(fd, &msg, sizeof(msg)) != sizeof(msg)) {
> error_report("failed to write, fd=%d, errno=%d (%s)",
> fd, errno, strerror(errno));
> @@ -185,6 +193,124 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(MemoryListener
> *listener)
> v->iotlb_batch_begin_sent = false;
> }
>
> +static void vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
> +{
> + struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(listener, struct vhost_vdpa,
> listener);
> + vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_end_once(v);
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_vdpa_iommu_map_notify(IOMMUNotifier *n, IOMMUTLBEntry
> *iotlb)
> +{
> + struct vdpa_iommu *iommu = container_of(n, struct vdpa_iommu, n);
> +
> + hwaddr iova = iotlb->iova + iommu->iommu_offset;
> + struct vhost_vdpa *v = iommu->dev;
> + void *vaddr;
> + int ret;
> + Int128 llend;
> +
> + if (iotlb->target_as != &address_space_memory) {
> + error_report("Wrong target AS \"%s\", only system memory is allowed",
> + iotlb->target_as->name ? iotlb->target_as->name :
> "none");
> + return;
> + }
> + RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD();
> + /* check if RAM section out of device range */
> + llend = int128_add(int128_makes64(iotlb->addr_mask),
> int128_makes64(iova));
> + if (int128_gt(llend, int128_make64(v->iova_range.last))) {
> + error_report("RAM section out of device range (max=0x%" PRIx64
> + ", end addr=0x%" PRIx64 ")",
> + v->iova_range.last, int128_get64(llend));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if ((iotlb->perm & IOMMU_RW) != IOMMU_NONE) {
> + bool read_only;
> +
> + if (!memory_get_xlat_addr(iotlb, &vaddr, NULL, &read_only, NULL)) {
> + return;
> + }
> + vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_begin_once(v);
I think at most 2 ioctls for this, is this still worth to batch them?
Other looks good.
Thanks
> + ret = vhost_vdpa_dma_map(v, VHOST_VDPA_GUEST_PA_ASID, iova,
> + iotlb->addr_mask + 1, vaddr, read_only);
> + if (ret) {
> + error_report("vhost_vdpa_dma_map(%p, 0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ", "
> + "0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ", %p) = %d (%m)",
> + v, iova, iotlb->addr_mask + 1, vaddr, ret);
> + }
> + } else {
> + vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_begin_once(v);
> + ret = vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(v, VHOST_VDPA_GUEST_PA_ASID, iova,
> + iotlb->addr_mask + 1);
> + if (ret) {
> + error_report("vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(%p, 0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ", "
> + "0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ") = %d (%m)",
> + v, iova, iotlb->addr_mask + 1, ret);
> + }
> + }
> + vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_end_once(v);
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> + MemoryRegionSection *section)
> +{
> + struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(listener, struct vhost_vdpa,
> listener);
> +
> + struct vdpa_iommu *iommu;
> + Int128 end;
> + int iommu_idx;
> + IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + iommu_mr = IOMMU_MEMORY_REGION(section->mr);
> +
> + iommu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*iommu));
> + end = int128_add(int128_make64(section->offset_within_region),
> + section->size);
> + end = int128_sub(end, int128_one());
> + iommu_idx = memory_region_iommu_attrs_to_index(iommu_mr,
> + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> + iommu->iommu_mr = iommu_mr;
> + iommu_notifier_init(&iommu->n, vhost_vdpa_iommu_map_notify,
> + IOMMU_NOTIFIER_IOTLB_EVENTS,
> + section->offset_within_region,
> + int128_get64(end),
> + iommu_idx);
> + iommu->iommu_offset = section->offset_within_address_space -
> + section->offset_within_region;
> + iommu->dev = v;
> +
> + ret = memory_region_register_iommu_notifier(section->mr, &iommu->n,
> NULL);
> + if (ret) {
> + g_free(iommu);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&v->iommu_list, iommu, iommu_next);
> + memory_region_iommu_replay(iommu->iommu_mr, &iommu->n);
> +
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_del(MemoryListener *listener,
> + MemoryRegionSection *section)
> +{
> + struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(listener, struct vhost_vdpa,
> listener);
> +
> + struct vdpa_iommu *iommu;
> +
> + QLIST_FOREACH(iommu, &v->iommu_list, iommu_next)
> + {
> + if (MEMORY_REGION(iommu->iommu_mr) == section->mr &&
> + iommu->n.start == section->offset_within_region) {
> + memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier(section->mr, &iommu->n);
> + QLIST_REMOVE(iommu, iommu_next);
> + g_free(iommu);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void vhost_vdpa_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> MemoryRegionSection *section)
> {
> @@ -199,6 +325,10 @@ static void
> vhost_vdpa_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> v->iova_range.last)) {
> return;
> }
> + if (memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) {
> + vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_add(listener, section);
> + return;
> + }
>
> if (unlikely((section->offset_within_address_space & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)
> !=
> (section->offset_within_region & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK))) {
> @@ -278,6 +408,9 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_listener_region_del(MemoryListener
> *listener,
> v->iova_range.last)) {
> return;
> }
> + if (memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) {
> + vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_del(listener, section);
> + }
>
> if (unlikely((section->offset_within_address_space & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)
> !=
> (section->offset_within_region & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK))) {
> @@ -1182,7 +1315,13 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_dev_start(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> bool started)
> }
>
> if (started) {
> - memory_listener_register(&v->listener, &address_space_memory);
> + if (vhost_dev_has_iommu(dev) && (v->shadow_vqs_enabled)) {
> + error_report("SVQ can not work while IOMMU enable, please
> disable"
> + "IOMMU and try again");
> + return -1;
> + }
> + memory_listener_register(&v->listener, dev->vdev->dma_as);
> +
> return vhost_vdpa_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h
> index c278a2a8de..e64bfc7f98 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ typedef struct vhost_vdpa {
> struct vhost_dev *dev;
> Error *migration_blocker;
> VhostVDPAHostNotifier notifier[VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX];
> + QLIST_HEAD(, vdpa_iommu) iommu_list;
> + IOMMUNotifier n;
> } VhostVDPA;
>
> int vhost_vdpa_get_iova_range(int fd, struct vhost_vdpa_iova_range
> *iova_range);
> @@ -61,4 +63,13 @@ int vhost_vdpa_dma_map(struct vhost_vdpa *v, uint32_t
> asid, hwaddr iova,
> int vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v, uint32_t asid, hwaddr iova,
> hwaddr size);
>
> +typedef struct vdpa_iommu {
> + struct vhost_vdpa *dev;
> + IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr;
> + hwaddr iommu_offset;
> + IOMMUNotifier n;
> + QLIST_ENTRY(vdpa_iommu) iommu_next;
> +} VDPAIOMMUState;
> +
> +
> #endif
> --
> 2.34.3
>