[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] At long last: success with ratpoison
From: |
Ryan Yeske |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] At long last: success with ratpoison |
Date: |
Sat Nov 1 15:36:02 2003 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
twb <address@hidden> writes:
> Quoth Albert Meier <address@hidden> on or about Sat, 01 Nov 2003 11:28:40
> +0100:
> > square. So the magic combination for me is C-a and not C-t (The reason
> > being
> > an entry /etc/ratpoisonrc).
> > I can only guess at why the gentoo developers put it in there: to avoid
>
> screen(1) compatibility.
Yes. That's almost certainly why.
IIRC, I argued early on (like ratpoison 0.0.2 days or something) that
C-a should be the default out of the box, for the same reason
(screen(1) compat), and Shawn disagreed, and that was that :). I
still believe, at some level that C-a should be, or should have been
the default, but its definitely too late now, I think.
Ryan
- [RP] At long last: success with ratpoison, Albert Meier, 2003/11/01
- Re: [RP] At long last: success with ratpoison, twb, 2003/11/01
- Re: [RP] At long last: success with ratpoison,
Ryan Yeske <=
- Re: [RP] At long last: success with ratpoison, Hans Dieter Pearcey, 2003/11/01
- Re: [RP] At long last: success with ratpoison, Shawn Betts, 2003/11/02
- Re: [RP] At long last: success with ratpoison, John Meacham, 2003/11/02
- Re: [RP] At long last: success with ratpoison, Chris Beggy, 2003/11/02
- Re: [RP] At long last: success with ratpoison, Florian Cramer, 2003/11/02