[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers] Re: [Savannah] kit want to be a GNU package
From: |
Henrik Abelsson |
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers] Re: [Savannah] kit want to be a GNU package |
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2001 08:44:01 +0200 (CEST) |
On 14 May 2001, Hugo Gayosso wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Henrik Abelsson <address@hidden> writes:
>
>
> Don't worry, we are pretty backlogged ourselves. :-)
>
I know the feeling :)
>
>
> > I'm not sure you'll want kit in the state it's now - but i'm willing
> > to change what's needed to accommodate GNU needs..
>
> Excellent, please take a look at:
>
> GNU Coding Standards.
> <http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_toc.html>
>
Everything except some of the code formatting advice i like :)
> and
>
> Information For Maintainers of GNU Software
> <http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain_toc.html>
>
Hmm.. interesting issues you/we have to deal with to keep code Free.
>
> > * It depends on the horrible Qt toolkit (soon the gui will be
> > cleanly abstracted away from the protocol implementation, so
> > alternative frontends could be written without too much pain).
>
> I think this is really something to fix.
>
It's been fixed now, as promised :). The protocol implementations
are now completely separate from the frontend guis. We have a console, a
Qt and a wxWindows/GTK+ client in various stages of completion.
Much of the client code has basically been rewritten from scratch to be
much cleaner and portable.
> > * It's poorly documented. Read: hardly anything.
>
> There is a section about documentation in the coding standards, please
> take a look. (Texinfo is not difficult)
>
I'll take a look at the gnu standards and see how much needs to be done to
make it compliant.
Thank you very much,
-henrik