[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS
From: |
mose |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 13:42:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:51:19PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> In fact, if you release your software under the GPL v2 and later and a
> GPL v3 is released, people will have the choice to :
> - use your software under the GPL v2
> - use your software under the GPL v3
>
> So, if you think that the GPL v3 may be too restrictive for you, it is
> not really a problem to choose the "and later" since nothing forbid you
> too continue using the v2.
> The only reason to refuse the "and later version" is the fear the GPL
> v3 can be less restrictive.
- that sounds meaningful. I agree with that and will change my headers.
But I remain curious about the necessity to do that. Loic talked about
dangers. What may occur if licence is only specified to be v2 and not
later ? I'm okay it's not a problem, but what is the goal of that
statement ?
thanks for your time wasted for my comprehension,
regards,
mose
- [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, gnu, 2002/06/25
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, Loic Dachary, 2002/06/27
- Message not available
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, Loic Dachary, 2002/06/27
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, mose, 2002/06/27
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, Mathieu Roy, 2002/06/27
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS,
mose <=
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, Loic Dachary, 2002/06/27
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, Mathieu Roy, 2002/06/27