savannah-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Savannah-hackers] I have question about my project


From: Vincent Caron
Subject: Re: [Savannah-hackers] I have question about my project
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 22:58:24 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031014 Thunderbird/0.3

Dejan Lozanovic wrote:

The reason why I thing to release library under LGPL is to not force players to give their source code for their thanks I beileve if library is publish uder GPL too that would ruin cometition and fun with game since i beileve that every tank would look the same. I'm curious what is your opinion about this, about decision to publish library under LGPL.

Hello,

most hackers here will suggest to use the GPL as much as you can, and only keep the LGPL for very special cases. Maybe yours is one of them :). The following opinions are only mine and do not reflect a GNU official position.

Your IA competition game looks like an academic challenge, it is an emulation that requires two opposite features : some secret, so that the game is actually fun, and some knowledge exchange, in order the next event starts on higher intelligence grounds, and so on. It looks like a card game : you hide your game until the end, but everybody gets to know sooner or later what you had in hands, and might learn about your strategy.

It looks to me like you need temporisation : first players should be able to distribute their AI code in an obfuscated form (anyway C looks obfuscated for an AI :)), then post the source code a bit later. It is also interesting to let the players know that freeing the code is a matter of them making an ethical choice, and ask to be fair by releasing the code as GPL in a 'reasonable' delay. IMHO it is better that individuals make up their mind about choosing the GPL, rather than you imposing it. LGPL looks like a good option for your library to me.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]