savannah-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-hackers] [support #102576] [waiting for software update] Tech


From: nobody
Subject: [Savannah-hackers] [support #102576] [waiting for software update] Tech Only User is a m...
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 04:05:37 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3; Linux 2.4.18-27.7.x.cern; i686)


Support Request #102576, was updated on lun 03.11.2003 à 11:22
You can respond by visiting: 
http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailsupport&support_id=102576&group_id=11

Category: Software
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Summary: [waiting for software update] Tech Only User is a m...

By: yeupou
Date: lun 10.11.2003 à 10:05
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1896
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3; Linux 2.4.18-27.7.x.cern; i686)

Hi,      
     
After discussion, we keep the first strategy mentioned.     
Not that yours does not make sense, but since this part is     
not configurable and would require lot of work to make it     
so, we have to select the solution that would satisfy most     
of the persons.     
   
This is already fixed in the CVS development branch but I 
let this item  pending until we actually run the dev 
branch on this server. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

By: yeupou
Date: sam 08.11.2003 à 11:42
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1896
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3; Linux 2.4.18-27.7.x.cern; i686)

Well, the idea in the end is to permit people to configure     
if technician can modify a field or not.     
    
But if someone wants to use the distinction    
Technician/Manager, it theoretically means that the    
technician should not be managing the bug report: and    
closing it is a way to manage it. The technician should    
use the resolution field to say "fixed", and then, the    
manager should decide whether he want to close the report    
or wait for user input or whatever.    
    
Your idea of giving management rights to someone if he got    
assignement of an item is interesting, however, and easy   
to implement. I'll talk about that with people at CERN on   
Monday, both solutions are sensitive.    

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting: 
http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailsupport&support_id=102576&group_id=11

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]