[gnu.org #359140] Re: [Savannah-help-public] Redirecting bug-gnu-emacs to emacsbugs

[Joshua Ginsberg via RT]

Alright, so in conclusion, the router would only permit a posting to
address@hidden if the posting has the envelope MAIL FROM of
address@hidden -- otherwise, the message would
be redirected to address@hidden -- Don, I'll hang out
in #debian on oftc to coordinate this changeover in real-time. I'm
j00bar on IRC.

-jag

> address@hidden - Sun May 04 19:55:54 2008]:
> 
> On Fri, 02 May 2008, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> 
> > > Thank you -- by "envelope from" I mean the value submitted during the
> > > SMTP exchange for the MAIL command, e.g. MAIL FROM:
> > > <address@hidden> -- if this is correct, I can
> >              ^^^^^^
> >             bounces
> > 
> > > set up the router based on that, but I'd like to also restrict the
> > > router's action by client, that is, "What host will be sending the
mail
> > > that you actually want distributed to the list?" Will it be
> > > 64.62.190.156? Or 138.23.92.77?
> > 
> > I do not know the host. 
> 
> It'll normally be 138.23.92.77, assuming that the mail is sent
> directly from debbugs to the mailing list, and not via
> lists.donarmstrong.com as it is currently. [Obviously, that should be
> easily changeable if it's restricted like that, as it's not always
> going to be that machine.]
> 
> > It's not terribly serious if a few messages go straight to the
> > mailing-list without being fed through
> > address@hidden
> 
> Right. And in any event, debbugs does have reasonable loop handling,
> so most of these should be detected and discarded, *so long* as
> X-Loop: is kept intact when the messages are forwarded to address@hidden
> 
> 
> Don Armstrong
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Joshua Ginsberg <address@hidden>
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator