[task #16067] Submission of Dezyne

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Follow-up Comment #34, task #16067 (project administration):

>> The internal discussion was resolved in January
>
> No, not completely.

The discussion about the last non-issues that were raised:

 * All ASCII files, even if they are generated or trivial must have a
   copyright header,
 * Examples included in the documentation need individual copyright
   headers,
 * A file longer than 10 lines is never trivial,
 * A README file cannot serve to describe the copyright and license
   of ASCII files,

were resolved as being a much too strict--and wrong--interpretation of
the guidelines.  So from a Dezyne point of view, the discussion was
resolved.

> Something has happened.  You know that there was a follow-up.

The follow-up was meant to explain the above two points.  Then, there
was no remark on the explanation for over a week.  There is also another
thread about improving the maintainer guidelines and fixing this
approval process.  I do not see why that should hold up Dezyne, though.

Yesterday, one more source file without a header was found.  Of course,
I corrected that promptly, added headers to three more similar c++
header files and I have uploaded a new tarball:

    https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/download.php?file_id=52825

Someone please approve Dezyne right now.  Thanks.

Greetings,
Janneke


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16067>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.nongnu.org/