[task #16067] Submission of Dezyne

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Follow-up Comment #36, task #16067 (project administration):

Can someone---anyone---please approve Dezyne right now and can we
discuss any details, the utter brokenness of this process, and any
changes to the guidelines and documentation later?

>> So from a Dezyne point of view, the discussion was
>> resolved.
>
> From evaluator's point of view, it hasn't been resolved yet; it makes
little
> sense to post here until the private discussion is over.

Sorry for posting here again if that is inappropiate.

More than 10 days ago I have seen an email rehashing minor details that
were already discussed to death and deemed OK.  So I guess you are
asking us to trust that fruitful discussions are taking place elsewhere
(wondering about what, though)?  Because I haven't seen anything going
on for quite some time now (again!).  Also, I sure hope that GNU/FSF
will hurry up with making their processes---such as these---more
transparent.

As you can probably understand, we are getting requests about the
progress, the ETA and the timeline of hosting a package on Savannah and
I am not sure what to say (other than: it should not have taken more
than a few days to a week at most).  Some have even started to question
our sincerity of opening up the Dezyne sources and development process,
and the wisdom of choosing Savannah.

Greetings,
Janneke


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16067>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.nongnu.org/