[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network
From: |
Robert J. Hansen |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network |
Date: |
Sat, 21 May 2011 11:43:29 -0400 |
> Why? There are some SKS servers who are sitting on the DSL lines
> and have semi-static IPs. So, AFAIK, that's not a strict requirement.
The strict requirement is, "your machine's IP address must be reliably
accessible via DNS." So long as that's met, it's all good.
And even then, "strict requirements" are more "the community of SKS keyserver
operators expects this, unless you've got some really compelling reason
otherwise." If you were running an SKS keyserver on the moon and were only
accessible via an IP address which changed daily and no DNS, I have no doubt
keyserver operators would be lining up to peer with you anyway just for the
geek cred of being able to say "I'm peering with Free Luna!" :)
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Eygene Ryabinkin, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network,
Robert J. Hansen <=
Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, John Clizbe, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Scott Grayban, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Jeff Johnson, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Robert J. Hansen, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Arnold, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Scott Grayban, 2011/05/22
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Eygene Ryabinkin, 2011/05/22
Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, John Clizbe, 2011/05/21
Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Scott Grayban, 2011/05/22
Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Phil Pennock, 2011/05/21