[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network
From: |
Phil Pennock |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network |
Date: |
Sat, 21 May 2011 18:32:59 -0400 |
On 2011-05-21 at 12:30 -0500, John Clizbe wrote:
> There has never been a set format requirement for the email seeking peers.
> There's been a suggestion or two, but I don't recall a vote.
Part of that may be my fault: when I wrote the
http://code.google.com/p/sks-keyserver/wiki/Peering document, I went
through various steps I considered useful and drafted an email template
of "things that various people would like to see, that demonstrated that
you read instruction and have clue and is most likely to get you peers"
(connectivity, location, age of key-dump, proving that you *have* loaded
a key-dump, etc).
I don't think format requirements count anywhere near as much as content
requirements :) and I just tried to give good advice. If other people
are regarding it as a mandate then I've erred. Advice for tuning the
wiki page contents appreciated.
-Phil
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, (continued)
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, John Clizbe, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Scott Grayban, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Jeff Johnson, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Robert J. Hansen, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Arnold, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Scott Grayban, 2011/05/22
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Eygene Ryabinkin, 2011/05/22
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, John Clizbe, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Scott Grayban, 2011/05/22
- Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network,
Phil Pennock <=
Re: [Sks-devel] sks-network, Phil Pennock, 2011/05/21