[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Re: TeXmacs 1.0-1 -ffloat-store [Q]
From: |
David Allouche |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Re: TeXmacs 1.0-1 -ffloat-store [Q] |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 19:17:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 11:55:19AM +0200, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:
>
> > > > > CONFIG_CXXFLAGS="-m68020-60"
> > > >
> > > > how about "-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fno-implicit-templates" ?
> > > > They should be the same like on any other Linux machine and
> > > > afaics make sense.
> > >
> > > We do not longer use "-fno-rtti -fno-implicit-templates" since
> > > version 1.0.0.10 and "-fno-exceptions" will be added automatically.
> >
> > any pros/cons of rtti? I would imagine it just wastes memory if
> > you aren't using it.
>
> I don't know; David told me that he had to remove it for some reason.
Just go ahead... that is not used in the default setting because it
caused link errors with a buggy gcc in some broken RedHat distro, so
we were being conservative by not using this flag. As a package
maintainer you best know wether that works on your architecture.
--
-- David --