Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC-3.2 segfault and compilation fixes

[Igor V. Kovalenko]

David Allouche wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:31:40AM +0200, David Allouche wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:29:36AM +0400, Igor V. Kovalenko wrote:
> >
> > > diff -ur TeXmacs-1.0.1.16-src-orig/src/common.makefile.in 
> > > TeXmacs-1.0.1.16-src/src/common.makefile.in
> > > --- TeXmacs-1.0.1.16-src-orig/src/common.makefile.in	2003-06-30 
> > > 13:12:41.000000000 +0400
> > > +++ TeXmacs-1.0.1.16-src/src/common.makefile.in	2003-07-03 
> > > 22:54:33.000000000 +0400
> > > @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@
> > > $(classes_obj): Objects/%.o: %.cpp
> > >         $(call cxx_incl,$(classes_incl))
> > > $(data_obj): Objects/%.o: %.cpp
> > > -       $(call cxx_incl,$(data_incl),-I$(tmsrc)/include)
> > > +       $(call cxx_incl,$(data_incl) -I$(tmsrc)/include)
> > > $(edit_obj): Objects/%.o: %.cpp
> > >         $(call cxx_incl,$(edit_incl))
> > > $(guile_obj): Objects/%.o: %.cpp
> >
> > This is obviously a correct fix for a typo introduced in 1.0.1.16.
>
>
> Correction: the _really_ correct fix is using the cxx_incl_sys
> function (which does take two parameters) instead of cxx_incl.

Actually I've tried this. My first assumption was _sys part
is missing from name. This doesn't work for some reason during
compilation. Presented fix just works for me.

> The reason is that TeXmacs.h is included with "#include <TeXmacs.h>",
> so it is more correct to put its include path option after a "-I-"
> option (which is the value of the DASH_I_DASH variable except when the
> compiler is not gcc).