Re: [Texmacs-dev] debian packages of texmacs

[Sam Liddicott]

I don't see why the distros should not provide libguile 1 as well as libguile 2. They are clearly different enough to warrant it.

On 5 Jun 2016 6:06 p.m., "Karl Hegbloom" <address@hidden> wrote:

Work was begun but not completed. I want to help complete it but have other obligations right now so can't spend full time on it. I'm also not necessarily the most qualified in terms of knowledge and experience,  but will try. The work that was done is on a branch in my git clone,  on github. It was a long time ago.

I think that we should go straight to Guile 2.2.

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016, 02:45 Ingolf Schaefer <address@hidden> wrote:

Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2016, 10:26:34 schrieb kamaraju kusumanchi:
> I see that my name is mentioned in the maintainers of Debian package
> of texmacs - http://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/download/linux.en.html#debian
> . Could you please remove it? I stopped maintaining it a while ago. In
> fact, Texmacs is removed from Debian unstable due to dependency on
> guile-1.8 (Debian has moved to guile-2.0) and lack of maintainer
> [1],[2].
>
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797833
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825252
>
> thanks
> raju
Hi,

I can confirm that a similar discussion is happening in Mageia community. I'm
afraid that this will come for other Linux distributions as well in future.

Is there any progress on a port to a recent Guile or another recent scheme
dialect?

Yours,

Ingolf

_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev

_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev